Protein Treatments (Hair) – Revisited

Neutrogena Triple Repair - Protein Treatments

Because I have yet to find my unicorn when it comes to shampoo and conditioner, I am on the hunt. I decided to try an offering from Neutrogena, recently, their Triple Repair line.

I am a fool, though, because when I skimmed the ingredients list I somehow missed that this line does include protein treatments. The clue-in should’ve been right in the name, “repair.” Alas, many, “repairing,” products fortify the hair with protein…but as I mentioned before, there is such a thing as too much of a good thing.

Things were smooth sailing for two weeks and then took a dive; my tresses went psycho again, rife with dryness and tangles and rage.

When your hair is lower-ribcage length angry snarls are seriously no fun. I’d brush my hair our before bed, wake up with a horrific knotted mass (that is not normally the case for me).

The lightbulb flashes, I went to the bathroom and scoured the labels of the shampoo and conditioner, already realizing what I’d done. The conditioner

Water, Cetyl Alcohol, Dimethicone, Stearyl Alcohol, Behentrimonium Chloride, Behenyl Alcohol, Hydroxyethylcellulose, Dimethylpabamidopropyl Laurdimonium Tosylate, PPG-1 Trideceth-6, Hydrolyzed Lupine Seed Extract, Amodimethicone, Cetearyl Alcohol, Polyquaternium-37, Propylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate, Behentrimonium Methosulfate, Citric Acid, Sodium Hydroxide, Phenoxyethanol, Caprylyl Glycol, Fragrance

Noooooo. My suspicions were confirmed; I made a mistake. My unreasonably protein-sensitive hair was having a tantrum again due to this innocuous-seeming ingredient. Not even halfway through the tubes!

The shampoo contains some oat and wheat components, which typically do indicate protein. As far as I know it is okay with wheat stuff (I really loved the Aveeno Nourish and Soothe [now discontinued]), unsure about oat though.

No sass about the products – they cleaned well, and were kind to my scalp. My hair was shiny, soft, and had an almost, “fluffy,” quality before it decided it was over the protein. Just a heads-up in case your hair is sassy like mine and doesn’t care for protein – pass this one up.

Clarisonic Mia 2: A Year of Use

clarisonic

Clarisonic Mia 2: A Year of Use

A post on a Thursday? This must be special, right?. I alluded in my Weekend Trip Skincare and October Favorites posts, I own a Clarisonic Mia 2. At long last, I am so damn pleased to share this with you. I have used my Clarisonic Mia 2 to cleanse my skin daily for over a year just so I could get out of the device’s, “OMIGAW I LOVE THIS THING!!!” It was very important to me to deliver an assessment that isn’t penned with rose-colored lenses in the way; I feel that happens all too often when we make investment or luxury purchases.

You can check out my extensive assessment: Clarisonic Mia 2: A Year of Use skincare device here. (Originally shared as a guest post on a now-defunct blog that went down for shady reasons; I removed the references to it as the content was my own.)

I address:

  • the product’s performance in comparison with its claims (as always)
  • its pros and cons
  • brush and battery-charge lifespan
  • whether or not I think it is a good value
  • and if I would repurchase the Clarisonic Mia 2, if I had to do it over again

…among other things.

Glambot Procedure Inquiry

Glambot Procedure Inquiry

In June, I published a three part series on my experience with used cosmetic retailer, Glambot.

Overall, I was satisfied with the items I received. They are genuine, undamaged, and accurately depicted for the most part (and always accurately described). I was impressed by the level of care taken to package the items.

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

I hop on every now and then mostly to see if I can snag a good deal on a tub of MAC pigment (Rushmetal has me hooked), but have not made any additional purchases – either they haven’t listed one I’m interested in, or they had a listing but it was sold out, or the timing just wasn’t right for me.

In Monday’s makeup destashing post, I mentioned I was destashing a MAC lipstick (to Back2MAC) that I had purchased from them as a part of that haul — Cosmo, to be specific. Since I last used it, it has gone from MAC’s signature pleasant vaguely-vanilla scent to smelling like old, cheap crayons. It bums me out because I really dig the color (don’t let my infrequent use fool you – I don’t wear lipcolor daily). I didn’t think much of it – after all, Glambot procedures surely will not include carbon-dating a lipstick, and most packaging doesn’t have a date-stamp (though that would be really helpful, manufacturers!).

A reader pointed out that batch numbers of products certainly could (and perhaps should) be cross-referenced as part of Glambot procedures to ensure that a seemingly-good product wouldn’t be on the brink of expiration. I have reached out to Glambot to confirm their procedure for certifying such products before accepting/reselling them.

Once I hear back and have a solid answer regarding my Glambot procedure inquiry, I will be sure to post an update so you can have a better idea of the length to which Glambot goes to verify product age before resale. All of my other products from my Glambot haul are fine (including the other lipstick, which still smells of vanilla and happiness).


 

EDIT: I have gotten a response. Check this post for details.

Makeup Destash

If you’re a makeup or beauty enthusiast, you likely end up with some products that do not appeal to you in the way you hoped (unless you’re some kind of beauty wizard who somehow only manages to buy products that work for you). This doesn’t necessarily mean those products are bad, but maybe they weren’t the best for your skin type or maybe the color wasn’t flattering on you. These are the products we should destash, but often aren’t.

It is hard to get rid of these items – maybe you’re holding out hope that something will work after all. Maybe you just can’t (and I can relate) bring yourself to get rid of it because you spent your hard-earned money on it and don’t want to admit to yourself that it was a waste. In reality though, if you aren’t using or enjoying it, it is already a waste.

At this point in my life, I am not interested in a gigantic collection. I find the idea overwhelming, actually, and I’d hate to invest that much money in products that wouldn’t be able to be used and loved often simply because I had so many. That preference, along with the fact that I lack abundant space to store such things, means I need to constantly reassess my collection and make sure I am satisfied with the level of use my products are receiving; if I am dissatisfied, I destash.

Admittedly, I had not conducted a destash in a while – not since mid-August. A busy season of my life was ending and I looked forward to relaxing and not having a miles-long to-do list. Recently, a community I am part of challenged us members to share the contents of their collections in a photo series. Going through and staging products to take these pictures was a great opportunity to reassess. In doing so, I found:

Makeup Destash November 2014 - my MAC Cosmo had expiredMAC Cosmo – to be destashed
  • A MAC lipstick from my Glambot haul, Cosmo, had gone bad. I haven’t worn it since my July wedding, so sometime between then and now it went from MAC’s signature vanilla to smelling vaguely of cheap crayons. (I won’t blame Glambot for this – it isn’t like they have an effective way to test the age of the lipstick. EDIT: I’m a derp, which Alex points out in the comments. I’ve reached out to Glambot to see if they check batches because, well, they should). No questions asked – detash.Makeup Destash November 2014 - Milani Fruit Punch feels and smells great, but isn't the shade for me
  • My only Milani lip product feels great going on and smells like Kool-Aid – but the shade, Fruit Punch, is just not flattering – not when I have color from self-tanning, not when I’m pale. It went into my, “destash,” pile.
    Makeup Destash November 2014 - Rimmel Solstice was purchased on accident
  • I have two tubes of Rimmel Apocalips/Show-Offs: one in Solstice, one in Comet. The colors are very similar, definitely in the MLBB range (for me) but Solstice is cooler and has shimmer whereas Comet does not. I can’t remember even wearing Solstice (in fact, I purchased it on accident – a Solstice tube was in a Comet slot), and couldn’t think of a time soon where I would want to because I don’t care for shimmery lip products. Destash it is.
    Makeup Destash November 2014 - e.l.f. Studio Pink Passion isn't a great color on my skin
  • This e.l.f. Studio Blush in Pink Passion is going in the destash pile because it is just too dang pink and looks silly (I think) on my face).

As for what becomes of the items I relegate to destash, it depends on why they’re being destashed and what they are. The MAC lipstick is being kept separate from my collection for Back2MAC. The Milani and Rimmel lip products, along with the blush will go to my younger sister who enjoys makeup. If it has gone bad, it goes in the trash unless a Back2MAC thing applies. If it is a prestige item that is still good and can be sanitized, I may try to trade it somewhere like /r/MakeupExchange or sell it to Glambot. These are some examples of what you can do to destash.

Identifying unused items is easy for me because my makeup collection isn’t very large. If yours is, or you just don’t know where to start, you can adapt the reverse-hanger trick that you might use in a closet to identify unworn clothes. Stage your makeup upside down or put it in a separate organizer, only returning it to its, “proper,” home after you have used it at least once. After a predetermined period of time (at least a month, but no more than three), anything left upside-down or in that separate organizer is what you should destash. (Give foundation/concealer some grace at your discretion if it is just a shade-match matter).

To avoid amassing a collection that is effectively beyond your use, try to keep things organized. Instead of stuffing everything into a battered makeup bag, you can get some (very inexpensive) organizers from Target, Wal-Mart, or wherever you please. The Container Store and IKEA are also good resources for this. Keeping things accessible helps you use your collection more effectively and helps keep you aware of what you have so you don’t wind up purchasing unwanted dupes and such (which helps you avoid needing to destash as often).

You should not feel the need to keep items you aren’t using–they will just wind up expiring. Even if it isn’t from disliking that product, if you aren’t using it it is just taking up space; it is one more thing to keep track of, organize, and so forth. It isn’t worth the time, and someone else might really enjoy that product (whether regifted or resold). Don’t become a hoarder!

Worth it? EcoTools Eye Enhancing Duo Set

Unless you are a beauty minimalist, I feel like makeup brushes, particularly eye brushes, are one thing you can never have too many of. I added four more brushes to my collection–the EcoTools Eye Enhancing Duo–in anticipation of the trip I recently took. I wanted to pack light; the fewer brushes, the better. Retailing at only $5.99 in mass retailers like Wal-Mart and Amazon, drugstores, Amazon, etc (with coupons readily available – I got mine for $4.99!). it was worth a gamble; even if the EcoTools Eye Enhancing Duo did not blow me away $1.25 per brush is an easy sacrifice for science.

EcoTools Eye Enhancing Duo SetEcoTools Eye Enhancing Duo Set

As drugstore brushes go, there are scads of no-names we’ve all never heard of (though surprisingly one of those no-name brands, “Essential Tools,” at Wal-Mart has a couple hidden gems) and there are Real Techniques and EcoTools, both of whom have great reviews. Prior to the EcoTools Eye Enhancing Duo set, I had experience with only one EcoTools brush –  a gigantic fan brush that I use to apply pressed powder with. I’m happy with it, and was eager to see how these worked out.

Read more

Drugstore Products I’ve Changed My Mind On

You get something new, and it doesn’t live up to whatever expectations you have. Or maybe it is a really great product. Even if you like it, sometimes you’ll set it aside and find yourself revisiting it some time later, only to form a completely different opinion.

Here’s a list of products I’ve changed my mind on:

Changed My Mind - L'Oreal Voluminous Miss Manga MascaraProduct I’ve Changed My Mind on
No. 1 L’Oreal Voluminous Miss Manga Mascara

At first, I was happy with this product; in fact, I posted my positive review just over a month ago. In just a month, the consistency has changed enough that the product causes my lashes to clump (even though it is not particularly dry). I can only separate them by going through them with a lash comb afterwards and I don’t have time for that. That isn’t to say the product is bad – I know some prefer that look, but I prefer definition and length to volume…so I’ve changed my mind on this mascara and will not repurchase.

Changed My Mind - Maybelline Color Tattoos

Product I’ve Changed My Mind on
No. 2 Maybelline Color Tattoos

This is something else I’ve shared recently. I tried the products but ultimately felt they didn’t live up to the hype so into the back of the drawer they went. I recently re-discovered them and found that they’re great when used with a specific Real Techniques brush. So glad I gave them a second chance.

Changed My Mind - Milani Eye Tech Extreme Liquid Liner

Product I’ve Changed My Mind on
No. 3 Milani Eye Tech Extreme Liquid Line

This felt-tip liquid liner’s formula is a great inexpensive dupe for Stila Stay All Day Liquid Liner. I used to really like it (especially at its price point), but the product itself didn’t properly flow all the way to the very fine tip of the felt pen which made it harder for me to achieve a fine line when I wanted (aka most of the time)…and so I changed my mind about it. If you want a suuuper-fine line, this isn’t the one for you. If you don’t mind your lines being a little thicker or having to go back and clean it up, this is still a good product. The formula is quality – it lasts, doesn’t smear, and is surprisingly gentle to the eye (in case your hand jerks during application and you draw on your eye – not that I know anything about that).

Changed My Mind - Maybelline Baby Lips

Product I’ve Changed My Mind on
No. 4 Maybelline Baby Lips

The Baby Lips line has had several iterations by now. I tried the first and then one or two here and there since, and the result has been the same. They were decent enough at first, but by the time I got midway through the tube I just wasn’t impressed because they feel like any other cheap balm (I actually prefer classic Chap-Stick [Cherry] to this). As a basic balm goes, there are better ones out there in terms of moisturization. As a tinted balm goes, there are ones that are better in terms of pigmentation and moisture. It just isn’t a formula that does much for me, and I will not repurchase it unless they come out with a new formula.

Originally, this was intended to be an overall things I’ve changed my mind on – but I have come to realize that I haven’t (yet) changed my mind on any of my prestige beauty products. I’ve tried things that disappointed, sure – but I haven’t yet changed my mind on one.

What about you? Have you had any products unexpectedly fall into or out of favor after your initial assessment?